Architecture review
Trust boundaries, data paths, exposed components, integrations and resilience assumptions.
Review architecture, configuration, identity, access, data and operations to expose security gaps and prioritize corrective work.
Overview
Understand exposure before choosing the fix.
Designed for
Organizations inheriting or modernizing a system
Teams preparing for an external assessment
Leaders seeking a prioritized security improvement plan
Engagement scope
Trust boundaries, data paths, exposed components, integrations and resilience assumptions.
Authentication, privileged access, role design, lifecycle and separation of duties.
Cloud, network, application and operational settings within the approved evidence boundary.
Logging, alerting, backup, recovery, change and incident-handling readiness.
How we work
Define systems, evidence access, stakeholders, constraints and the decisions the audit must support.
Review documentation, architecture, configuration and operational evidence without changing the environment.
Connect observed conditions to plausible impact, existing controls and business context.
Group corrective work by urgency, dependency and implementation effort for accountable follow-through.
Typical deliverables
Relevant work
A consolidated operational surface for continuous security posture and risk review.
FlowOps Security & ComplianceQuestions, answered
No. An audit reviews architecture, configuration and operating controls; penetration testing actively tests an authorized technical scope. They can complement each other.
Not by default. The audit is evidence-led and read-only; remediation is separately authorized and controlled.
Yes. Scope can cover a specific application, platform, cloud environment or defined operational boundary.
Architecture. Engineering. Security.
Have a project in mind?
We'd love to hear about it.